Systematic Comparison between Traditional and Agile Methods Essay

Systematic Comparison between Traditional and Agile Methods - Essay Example almost do not go through every the stages while others may pass through one stage more than once. The Traditional approach involves designing a detailed plan before the source of the picture and strictly adhering to it. Therefore, the whole project is clear to the developers before it is started. Agile project management is a collaborative approach in which all the aggroup members ar involved in the project. It involves an iterative process in which managers facilitate the working of the team and it requires regular adaptation to changing situations. The project plan is flexile and is not developed at the beginning of the project. Instead, it is developed throughout the project. The end result of the project is not predictable. This discussion explores the comparison between traditional and mobile project management approaches. Traditional Project Management Approaches The traditional approach to proje ct management consists of five components namely initiation, planning, execution, monitoring and control, closure. Some traditional project management methods include analog and incremental project management lifecycle. Linear project management lifecycle does not allow any changes in the project plan. ... schedule the whole project before starting it gives the team a clear picture of what is anticipate to be done and who is responsible for each task. Moreover, details roughly the resources necessary for the completion of the project are known from the beginning. This approach does not require people with a lot of skills and supervision is not necessary as all the project details are written down. Co-location of team members is not necessary as each person has details of the part he/she is expected to play. It also has disadvantages. This model does not allow for changes. It is also very costly. It does not produce deliverables until in the late stages of the project. In additio n, preparing a complete plan onwards is time wasting. The process is rigid and there is no going back to make changes. This model is focused on the timely completion of the project in spite of appearance the available budget but not on client value (Wysocki 2011). Incremental project management life cycle consists of several dependent increments, each with the lifecycle components of execution, monitoring, and project closure. These increments are accomplished in a prearranged sequence. The characteristics of the incremental project management lifecycle method are similar to those of the linear approach. The deliverables in this model are released against a schedule that is more aggressive. Advantages include the following The business value is produced early and not at the end of the project like in linear approach. This model can allow for some changes in the scope of the project. It focuses on the client value more than the linear approach. It also facilitates the scheduling of few resources better. Some disadvantages include the following Team members can be lost in between increments. It